It is enough to go around the social networks to reach the conclusion (I would like to think that it is wrong) that the vast majority of FC Barcelona fans they have a perfectly formed opinion on the dark matter of Ferran Reverter’s departure. A prodigy of collective clairvoyance, because none of the affected parties has seen fit to give explanations beyond the handy and slightly insulting formula of “personal and family reasons & rdquor ;. This is how the so-called public opinion works, always ready to give lessons, make judgments and dictate sentences, whether it is a debate about the scope of the powers of the CEO, the goodness of the new sponsorship agreement or the effectiveness of high-bloc pressure.
Related news
Here, as in so many other matters, bias is everything. The bellicose anti-laportista front has decided that the still acting CEO (the same one who assured in his day that Josep Maria Bartomeu’s mandate had left Barça “in a situation of dissolution & rdquor ;, it should be remembered) is an incorruptible Eliot Ness School executive that he wasn’t willing to put up with the president’s hustle and bustle for another minute; Laporta’s clappers, for their part, attribute the break to Reverter’s intention of attacking the history of the club by want to impose a property model that would leave an important part of the entity in the hands of large companies, thus taking power away from the partners. The truth, presumably, will be there, somewhere in the vast terrain that stretches between one version and another.
Reverter’s output, in any case, has served to make starkly visible the almost absolute power enjoyed by the president of FC Barcelona after winning the elections. If, to justify the departure of the CEO, Laporta and his people want to hide behind the defense of the interest of the partners, it would not hurt if they made some gesture to consolidate the role of these, who after all are the supposed owners of the club. reinforce the internal control mechanisms so that, for example, the president had to account to the members for the appointments (and dismissals) that occur at the main management levels of the entity would be a step in the right direction. It will not happen.