The 3 reasons for ERC’s ‘no’ to the labor reform after the last contacts

  • The content of the agreement, the forms and the guarantees separate the Republicans from the two partners of the Government

The main partner of the government of PSOE and United We Can in Congress, ERC, is against one of the half-stars of this legislature, the labor reform. The General Government Budgets (PGE) saved, the one and the other show poor harmony on an issue on which everyone agreed in the election campaign, the forced need to “recall” the norm approved by the PP. These are the reasons why Republicans remain in a ‘no’ without internal rifts.

The opposition to the text Yolanda Diaz with unions and employers is frontal. According to Republican sources, there is “no reference to wage processing or subcontracting in the initiative.” In addition, the ERC sent a specific wording to the Government “which Collective bargaining in Catalonia and, as for the ERE, Esquerra raised “the restoration of administrative authority and not just a report of the Labor and Social Security Inspectorate (ITSS).

Related news

This is perhaps the crux of the matter, because in principle a labor negotiation between left-wing parties should have a horizon of agreement. But ERC complains about Government veto “touch a single comma” of the treaty concluded with the CEOE, after the employer’s threat to withdraw from the agreement if the text has undergone any amendment. Esquerra sees it as unacceptable that “an agreement concluded in an office cannot be retouched in the seat of popular sovereignty.” For this reason, they defend the processing of the new labor regulation as accountand not as a decree.

Spain today has a coalition government, something that has been untapped since 1978. It forces the ERC to deal with the two souls of the Executive, knowing that, deep inside, whoever is cutting the cod is one, the PSOE and, specifically, Pedro Sanchez. This means that the offers that come directly to them from the Vice President Yolanda Diaz, from United We Can, are welcomed by all precautions by ERC because they do not have the socialist endorsement. That is, they are wet paper. For this reason, the Republicans demand that, in this processing as a bill, the amendments be “compiled and signed” by the three parties (PSOE, United We Can and ERC) and that the votes be made public. The publicity in the communication comes from the under the table presentations that have come to them, promises of amendment requested to be kept in the private sphere. Something that ERC is opposed to, claiming the need for light and stenographers.

Reference-www.elperiodico.com

Leave a Comment