PP and Vox, the only ones that do not respond to the law that penalizes the acoustic front to abortion clinics

  • The initiative, initiated by the PSOE, will not take place in the Senate

All the groups of the Congress, saluting the PP and Vox, have responded to the call, prompted by the PSOE, that punishable by penalties for women who commit adultery with a woman who is in a clinic to interrupt voluntary work, with which the initiative will now be passed on to the Senate.

With the approval of the dictatorship of the Commission of Justice, the law, which voted in favor of concluding the Plenary, culminates in its decision in the Cámara Baja, months after -of the passing of September- that the majority of groups approved the proposal of to the PSOE in order to reform the Criminal Code and to cast a sentence on those who accuse and host the women who accuse these clinics of abortion.

The PSOE’s deputy Laura Berja has been under the influence of submission to the tribune to defend the initiative of his group with what he has, he said, “parliamentary history” and he has been criticized throughout the PP for his rejection of the text and he has accused of having elected, a vez more, along with Vox “the wrong band”.

They have been accused of signaling women to abort in order to comply with their decision and with their position, while not defending religious freedom, without the accusers and accusers, while acknowledging the rest of the groups and their abortions. the response to the text. And it is because PP and Vox oppose the principle of the initiative against which the presenters are sent to the totality that was fired.

Since the PP, Teresa Angulo has insisted that the initiative has a “clear ideological ideology” that “awakens” against tolerance and freedom, in the form that it does not pretend to solve a real problem will impede the rights of reunion and expression. “No one should specify that the agreement is restricted by censorship before the right of expression, even if the Constitution is enforced”, Angulo assured.

In the same way, Lourdes Méndez, Vox, stated: “A part of this will be considered honorable by a Gobierno who indicted terrorists and put him in prison, who dedicated himself to saving lives,” he said. which has advanced that the appeal to the Constitutional Tribunal.

Dictation of the Commission

The Commission of Justice approved the passage on 22 December of the ruling on its proposal with the amendments agreed by the PSOE, United Nations, ERC, PNV and Ciudadanos.

The cambios include that only those who are responsible for the abortions that are performed at these centers for abortion should also be cared for by the law enforcement agencies and the health care clinics and directives that conduct abortions. And that the original planteaba initiative includes a new article in the Penal Code (the 172 quarters) to focus on concentrating on the gates of abortive and hostile clinics and shortening the freedom of women with a three-month prison sentence a one year or with work for the benefit of the community from 31 to 80 days. In addition, the acoustic will be persecuted if it needs an express denial of the woman in order to initiate the procedure.

The rest of the group that started the show, except UPN, applauded the future.

“Absolute cruelty”

“The reason is not the freedom of expression and the end that persecution is signaled and coaxed”, has questioned the deputy of the United States Martina Velarde, who has made sure that when a woman decides to abort she has thought much because it is a “tremendously long and difficult” decision, as she encounters a “horda de integrista”. “It’s an absolute cruelty”.

The ERC’s deputy Pilar Vallugera has refuted the arguments of the PP and Vox and has insisted that those concentrating on the clinics are “energetically” with their actions in support of the women, as well as Pilar Calvo, of the Plural Group, ha also applauded the approval of the text.

For his part, Sara Giménez’s deputy mayor announced that the women had given him many explanations and that he had “much more desigualad”. “Ya está bien”, ha dicho.

Related News

And the deputy of the PNV Mikel Legarde reiterated that one thing is the freedom of expression and the ownership of the right to the meeting to express the right to a regulation and otherwise it is “intimidating, coaxing, defecting” the women who want to own reconciled in the ordinance provocative temor, intranquilidad and angustia.

From EH Bildu, Isabel Pozueta stated: “Go to abortion clinics and get pregnant. Peace be upon you, we do not need paternalism, we decide.”

Reference-www.elperiodico.com

Leave a Comment