An investigation conducted by members of the Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore concludes that the restrictions and restrictions on mobility have had little effect on public health, and a reduction in efficiency due to the reduction in mortality by Covid-19. Without embarrassment, these mediocre people have enormous economic and social costs all over which they have been adopted.
Specifically, consider that these media have contributed to reducing economic activity, increasing the number of cases, reducing schooling, causing political disturbances, contributing to domestic violence and promoting liberal democracy. Therefore, the studio advertises a revision of the confinement and blockchain policies of mobility, and these strategies are fundamentally flawed and need to be revised as opposed to future pandemics.
The study is more about confinement, reference is made to any government mandate that directly restricts the possibilities of movement of persons, such as policies that limit internal movement, close schools and negotiations, and prohibit international travel.
The investigators carried out a systematic review and a meta-analysis designed to determine if they had empirical evidence that supported these ‘blocks’ of the population, noting that a intervention in compulsory pharmaceuticals was needed. This study employs a systematic search and writing procedure that identifies 18,590 studies that could potentially override plant growth.
Once over three levels of detection, 34 studies are selected for inclusion in the methanalysis. Separate into three groups: block rig index studies, shed shelter refuge studies (SIPO) and NPI-specific studies. An analysis of each of these three groups supports the conclusion that the blocks had little effect on the mortality by Covid-19.
Specifically, rigorous indexation studies found that blockades in Europe and the United States only reduced mortality by Covid-19 by 0.2% on average. Mientras que los confinements and it also tends to increase inefficiency, only reducing mortality by Covid-19 by 2.9% in the media.
Without embarrassment, the company does not essentially have had any effect, reducing the mortality rate by Covid-19 by 10.6%, which could be even more related to the bar price. The study, however, shows that the cubrebocas can reduce mortality by Covid-19, but only one study that examines the obligation to wear mascara, with which the investigators do not have many dates.
Regarding the effect of frontal cores, cerebral cysts and the limitation of social gatherings on Covid-19 mortality, the study produces weighted results with an estimate of a reduction of -0.1%, -4.4% and 1.6% , respectively. In addition, the study finds some evidence that limits counterproductive meetings and increases Covid-19 mortality.
Respect for the reasons why these remedies may have failed, noting that, including the restrictive restrictions, initially reducing Covid-19’s propagation, while stating that respecting the behavior of the population can counteract the effect, that the persons responding to a minor risk with a change of behavior.
Another question to be sure is that closeness and quarantine can have consequences not deadly. Aislar has an infected person hogar with his family, corre the risk of infecting the members of the family with a higher viral load, causing more serious illness. But in addition, the animals have restricted the access of people to safe places to air free of play, parks and zoologicals. Assimilation, limiting the meetings to free air has allowed people to reunite in safe places, in home or interior rooms.
His consequences are “devastators”
In view of the political and economic implications, the study considers that in the first stages of the pandemic, in addition to the number of vacancies and new treatments, the company can respond in two ways: compulsory exchange rates or voluntary exchange rates.
The study does not demonstrate the significant positive effects of compulsory behavioral cams, the juice of its authors “should be called attention to the paper of voluntary cams”, and investigate how much more can be introduced.
It should be noted that it should be clarified that an important function of the governmental authorities is to provide information so that the citizens can respond voluntarily to the pandemic in a manner that mitigates their exposure.
And it is noted that the blocks of mobility in the population have a unique characteristic of the Covid-19 pandemic, ya que han han sido utilizados en ninguna pandemia del siglo pasado. It is therefore embarrassing to conclude that “the blocks during the initial phase of the Covid-19 pandemic have had devastating effects”.
The motive of this affirmation is that he contributed to reducing economic activity, increasing the example, reducing schooling, causing political disturbances, contributing to the domestic violence and joining liberal democracy.
“These costs for the company should compare with the benefits of the blocks, which our method has shown its margins in the majority of cases. This cost-benefit calculation has a solid conclusion: the blocks need to reconsider a plan as a pandemic policy instrument “, concluded.
Reference-www.eleconomista.com.mx