Article content

People who believe the Liberals are the natural governing party of Canada are predictably clutching their pearls and wagging their disapproving fingers at the political brawl in the Conservative leadership race.

advertisement 2

Article content

That’s because they’re offended that conflict, both externally against one’s political opponents and internally with one’s ostensible allies, is how political parties evolve.

Except when Liberals do it, of course.

Two of the fiercest internal battles in Canadian politics in the modern era were not defined by Pierre Poilievre and Jean Charest not shaking hands at last week’s Conservative leadership debate.

One of them was the civil war between Jean Chretien and Paul Martin for control of the Liberal party from 1993 until 2006, when they lost power to Stephen Harper and the Conservatives.

The other was Harper’s campaign to reunite the conservative movement after the old Progressive Conservative alliance shattered in the 1993 election, reducing Brian Mulroney’s ruling party to two seats, one of them occupied, ironically, by Charest.

advertisement 3

Article content

Out of that, Harper eventually forged a new Conservative Party from the remains of most, but not all, of the Progressive Conservatives, the Reform party and later offshoots — the United Alternative and Canadian Alliance parties.

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

Internal conflict is how political parties evolve.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s spendthrift Liberal government — well before the pandemic hit — is nothing like the fiscally conservative Chretien/Martin Liberals of the 1990s.

The Harper Conservatives were nothing like the Mulroney Progressive Conservatives.

In Ontario, the Doug Ford Progressive Conservative government, now seeking re-election, is nothing like the last successful PC government — Mike Harris’ “common sense” revolutionaries.

advertisement 4

Article content

Harris’ government was nothing like the last successful PC government before it — led by Bill Davis with his political philosophy that “bland works.”

Many of those appalled by the political brawl for the Conservative leadership today believe, for example, that there is only one “correct” position on abortion — the status quo — with no recognition of the fact many Canadians have genuine concerns about late-term and sex-selective abortions.

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

That there is only one “correct” position on climate change — more carbon taxes.

That there is only one “correct” position on the international order — with no recognition of the fact global organizations like the United Nations do in fact aim to reduce the sovereignty of nations and individuals for the presumed greater good of humanity, on issues such as climate change.

advertisement 5

Article content

As the UN itself puts it, “lifestyle changes are a prerequisite for sustaining reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and for bridging the emissions gap. Around two-thirds of global emissions are linked to … private household activities … Reducing emissions through lifestyle changes requires changing both broader systemic conditions and individual actions.”

Governments, the UN says, “have a major role in setting the conditions under which lifestyle changes can occur, through shaping policy, regulations and infrastructure investments … necessary to bring about wider changes in the social, cultural, political and economic systems in which people live.

“COVID-19 has provided insight into how rapid lifestyle changes can be brought about by governments… In planning the recovery from COVID-19, governments have an opportunity to catalyze low-carbon lifestyle changes by disrupting entrenched practices.”

Governments can achieve these goals, the UN says, through taxation and other policies affecting fundamental decisions we make about our lives, from what we eat (preferably meatless, low-carbon diets) to how we travel (less by air, more by subsidized electric cars).

It’s not a “global conspiracy” — it’s right out in the open.

[email protected]

advertisement 1


Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user follows comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your e-mail settings.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.