Would you buy someone’s backyard for $ 1 million? It may be one of the few places in Toronto where you can ‘own’ an alley house

An owner from the Kensington area is selling your backyard for just under $ 1 million, billing the over 1,000 square foot garage lot as the perfect spot for a street home.

But unlike almost every other street house in the city, this proposition on Croft Street near Bathurst and College streets could be bought without an accompanying house as, after more than three years of solicitations and Appeals, the owner managed to cut his property into two separate lots.

How? The lot is located on Croft Street, a lane, if not the only one, in Toronto that has the municipal amenities needed for a freestanding home, according to a city planner.

Garage neighbors include two other houses with alleys for sale in $ 3.25 million and $ 2 million – both stylish and modern homes jutting out from the graffiti-covered garages in the alley.

The owner has invoiced the property as "Completely independent lot with planning approvals," according to the listing.

The backyard listing includes plans for a house with alleys that features a patio, rooftop deck, and parking lot.

In 2016, owner Mark Teitelman, having noticed houses with alleys in Croft, saw an opportunity. He wanted to divide his property in two and sell the back half. But he didn’t want the resulting alley house to be a rental. In his opinion, that would offer him less flexibility and create more work for him.

“If you were to build an alley rental, all services would have to go through the main house, so you would have to dig all over the backyard,” he said. “That didn’t appeal to me.”

Instead, he embarked on a more than three-year trial to try to get city approval for compensation, even though he lived in the Goldilocks area of ​​Toronto property compensation.

A bird's-eye view of the severed property for sale.

“It was horrible,” he said. “It was a torture. I almost gave up so many times. At first when I applied, the city said, ‘No way, don’t even think about it.’ But there was another guy down the street, an architect, who managed to do it, so I went to the Adjustment Committee for him. But that didn’t work, so I had to appeal it to the Ontario Municipal Board and finally managed to get the permit there.

“A decision that should have taken three months took three and a half years.”

In 2019, it was finally discovered that Teitelman met all the necessary conditions to separate his property and build a street house. He believes the city “did not want houses to flourish on the streets.”

For its part, when the city approved its statute allowing houses with alleyways in 2018, it hoped to diversify downtown housing options by opening up more affordable spaces, imagining these houses only as rentals. Since then, about 50 houses of this type have been built.

"Croft is a peculiarity among the alleys of the city," says senior planner Graig Uens, as he has "water, restrooms, storm services, garbage collection, snow removal, mail delivery."

According to senior urban planner Graig Uens, there are few streets like Croft Street that have all the amenities necessary for severance pay to work. While all homeowners can apply for it, it is not a realistic goal for almost everyone.

The reason Teitelman’s bid finally succeeded is that Croft is not like other streets.

“Croft is a peculiarity among the streets of the city,” Uens said. “It is one of the extremely rare public roads that has its own services. So you have water, sanitation, storm services, garbage collection, snow removal, mail delivery; almost all public lanes in the city don’t have these things. “

Without access to its own services, a street house needs to connect to the services of its parent company. This could create complex legal circumstances if the houses had different owners.

54 Croft St. is also on the market for $ 3.25 million.

“When you depend on the house for services, it gets really complicated from a legal perspective,” Uens said. “If you are going to cut off the back property and all of a sudden your water and sanitation connection goes under the property behind you, there has to be some kind of easement or common element condo agreement in place that does (the lane) property basically subordinate to the other property in perpetuity. “

Still, despite the problems it could cause, some other street owners have made it work.

“The alley house will always be subordinate to the main house, even if it has been cut, unless you are in a situation like Croft Street,” Uens said. “But people have cut down the backyard and gone through the whole process of creating a separate property. It happened, now they are built and busy, but from a technical point of view, it was very difficult to make it work. “

An example is a property near Dovercourt and Dundas, where the owner requested to cut the lot to build two-lane homes. The application for the construction of houses with alleys was submitted in 2003 and approved in 2011.

4 and 6 Croft Street.  6 Croft St. is another high street house on the market, this one for around $ 2 million.

Now, the owners have reciprocal easements to deal with the distribution of services. But Uens cautioned that if something goes wrong with connecting the service to any of the three houses, it could be difficult to fix.

But Uens remains an advocate for increasing the number of homes with rental lanes in Toronto, saying it would be good for the city.

“I’ve talked to a lot of people in the last two years who have wanted to build them themselves to downsize and retire,” he said.

“It can be really challenging to grow old in the communities that you are in now and shrink at the same time. It is also useful for multigenerational families. I have heard of several examples of people who built a suite for their children to live in or expect them to move into the suite and their children move into the main house. . “

Other houses like Croft Street, a rare full-service alley in Toronto.

For Teitelman, the settlement process was slow and costly, as it had to hire attorneys, consultants and planners to help present its case.

“It was a really concerted effort, which I suppose was worth it, but it was really expensive and I wouldn’t try to do it again,” he said.

Ben Cohen is a Star staff reporter in Toronto. Follow him on Twitter: @bcohenn



Reference-www.thestar.com

Leave a Comment