The last weeks have not been easy for Ivonne reyes, Pepe navarro and the son in discord, Alejandro Reyes. Since 1995, the relationship between the presenter and the Venezuelan has been constant news source, so much so that 26 years later everything that revolves around her being a couple is an absolute unknown.
So is the fatherhood of the model’s son. And it is that, since the son of Reyes was born, the presenter has maintained that Pepe Navarro is the father of the young man, while the presenter has been denying this statement for years.
So great has been the tug of war that they have maintained that the protagonists ended up living an eternal legal battle that culminated in a judicial decision that Navarro did not like at all: Justice determined that Pepe was the father of the then minor after the presenter’s repeated refusals to take a DNA test.
Now, several years later, Ivonne and Pepe are once again in the focus of the news with a cascade of information that is put on the side of the presenter, that disassembles the version of the model and that would have answered the great unknown of this issue: who is the father of the son of Ivonne Reyes.
It has been the program presented by María Patiño, ‘Socialité ‘, the one who has taken a step forward, thus dismantling the version of the Venezuelan.
The identity of the father, exposed
As confirmed from the weekend space of Telecinco, the true father of Yvonne Reyes’ son would be a millionaire businessman who was paying the Venezuelan a pension of 6,000 euros per month since 1999, the year in which Alejandro was born, until 2002, moment in which he passed away.
Related news
This news would thus dismantle the version that the communicator would have been giving since she announced her pregnancy. Information that, in addition, I would leave Pepe Navarro out of the case.
And, to make matters worse, in recent weeks, the former lawyer of Ivonne Reyes, Sonia Gea, made it clear in an exclusive speech for ‘El Programa de Ana Rosa’ that Pepe Navarro was not Alejandro’s father and that he does not have any type of responsibility at a legal level with the young person.
Reference-www.elperiodico.com