Esteban Ibarra makes visible the dangers of the words of the Falangist Isabel Peralta in laSexta

‘Research team’ He issued his report on ‘Los puppies ultras’ this past Friday after the controversy that was generated by interviewing Isabel Peralta. In addition to his testimony, the current affairs program was attended by Esteban Ibarra, president of the Movement against Intolerance, who analyzed and made visible the dangers hidden between the words of the Falangist, who was not sorry for the anti-Semitic speech for which she is being investigated for a possible hate crime: “It does not constitute hate and, if it is, I do not care. I study law too.”

“I filed a complaint with the prosecution for hate crimes and anti-Semitism. I was very shocked by his words. Of course, we were not going to consent that this will be placed in the sphere of impunity“, Ibarra assured at the beginning of his speech in the laSexta space.

After being asked by the ‘Investigation Team’ journalist, Peralta assured that she believes she has become the visible head of her organization because, perhaps, she is “a girl”: “And because I’m not your typical neo-Nazi”.

It is dangerous not knowing how to identify. Ordinary people either have a high experience in the matter or know how to distinguish between them in a clear way. You can be talking to them or in football, for example, one of the places where they are usually and do not know who they are talking to, “said the president of the Movement against intolerance.

Subsequently, the Falangist continued to answer the questions, revealing that the people who belong to Frontal Bastion are “between 15-16 years old up to 30”, becoming defensive when the journalist stressed that they were also talking about minors, in addition to questioning the following statement: “If you can change your sex when you are 8 years old, how can you not be part of a group when you are 16?“.

“At the end many young people arrive, especially children who are beginning to form a political opinion on certain issues. Those 15-16 year old children were born with a mobile phone attached to their hand, therefore, you have that predisposition to meet us on social networks“, assured Peralta.

“We don’t manipulate anything. The intention is completely the opposite: that children when they are young, instead of military in street political activism, are first politically trained. So that makes the kid interested. He doesn’t have those prejudices that older people have. He has not yet been mentally manipulated“replied the girl.”That has a name: indoctrination“Said the journalist, who was answered again by Peralta:” I consider that it is not because we, I already told you. They like those values ​​that we try to instill in young people. Without indoctrinating. It is simply by way of example. “

“If a person internalizes this type of aggressive behavior, or there is high self-correction, or we are going to find a personality that projects violence”

After listening to his testimony, Esteban Ibarra also described these words as dangerous because there has not been time for the configuration of the conscience or a settlement of values ​​of the young: “The problem of the socialization of adolescents is that social networks have a lot of impact, having less the family, the teachers and even the traditional media.”

“If a person internalizes this type of aggressive behavior as an adolescent, when he is older, logically, or there is a high self-correction, or we will find a personality that later projects violence in all areas: against women, against immigrants, against the political opponent … So, the path they are taking is very dangerous“.

“They are building very bellicose behavior”

Later, after being also asked, Isabel Peralta considered it “necessary” that the members of her organization be enrolled in a gym to practice contact sports: “You are on the street and a person with a contrary ideology comes, well, they don’t have bands streets or an urban tribe, you have to know how to defend yourself. You cannot allow them to hit you. Violence is fought with violence. “

Related news

The ‘violence is fought with violence’ is terrible. The cult of violence that it raises and the way to resolve conflicts is the opposite of what is educated for coexistence. It is to push adolescents and young people. Let no one believe that using martial arts is not interpreted in court as possession of weapons, “said Ibarra.

The president of the Movement against Intolerance ended his speech by assuring that the Prosecutor’s Office “has to think about it a lot”: “They are aggressive, harsh, risque messages that do not leave room for the peaceful resolution of any controversy or conflict. They are building very bellicose behaviors“.



Reference-www.elperiodico.com

Leave a Comment