SCJN begins discussion on the case of Alejandra Cuevas-Gertz Manero

At 12:00 noon this Monday, March 14, in the plenary session of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) the review of the amparo promoted by Alejandra Guadalupe Cuevas Moranwho is imprisoned by an accusation of the Attorney General of the Republic, Alejandro Gertz Maneroof being guilty of the death of his brother, Federico Gertz Manero.

the minister Alberto Perez Dayan presents to the plenary of the Court a project that seeks the freedom of Cuevas Morán. Relatives of the imprisoned woman are outside the facilities of the SCJN awaiting resolution.

In November of last year, at the request of the same prosecutor Alejandro Gertz, the Supreme Court appealed for the injunctions promoted by Laura Moran Servin And your daughter Alejandra Guadalupe Cuevas Moranagainst the unitary resolution of February 22, 2021, issued by the Fourth Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of Mexico Cityin criminal file 69/2020.

In November, the president of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN), Arturo Zaldivar Lelo de Larreastated that the issue was attracted because it is an issue that affects the image of the General Prosecutor of the Republic and its owner.

“This case is a case that has generated a very important media interest and that due to its peculiarities about which it is not necessary for me to enter because you all know them, it has already been generating an affectation to the image of the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic and of the attorney general in its institutional capacity,” Zaldívar said on November 10.

Last week, after the broadcast of audios where the prosecutor Alejandro Gertz Manero revealed an operation in courts and in the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) for this matter, the country’s highest court defended its autonomy and guaranteed that in that case will act independently.

The Supreme Court held that its only commitment is to the Constitution and human rights.

“All matters within the jurisdiction of the Court are resolved independently, impartially and transparently, in public sessions in which the Ministers express the arguments that support the meaning of their votes, facing society and public scrutiny. ”, affirmed the highest court.

Leave a Comment