A conference with readings and interpretations for all tastes. By the organizer, a ‘think tank’ dependent on Foment del Treball led by the chairman of Agbar, Àngel Simón; for the guest, Salvador Wheelfather of the concept of ‘super apple‘, and for the matter, the urban and mobility model from Barcelona. There will be those who want to intuit a fierce criticism, one more, of the government of Ada Colau by the Catalan employers. There will be those who read true air of revenge by the one who was founder and director for 20 years of the Urban Ecology Agency of the townhall. And there will be those who see an interesting and entertaining Friday of ‘déjà vu’ of what the Catalan capital had in hand until the green axes projectan idea in which Rueda has not participated and with which, in his opinion, “none of the main challenges that Barcelona faces”.
All this, has exposed the now president of the Urban and Territorial Ecology Foundationwith much tactical urbanism and for a cost close to €300 millionnot much more, he has recalled, that what he invested in the two Glòries tunnels. If no one is a prophet in his land, Rueda seems to be no exception. He explained that there are many cities around the planet that have applied and are applying the super apple philosophyborn 35 years ago, that’s why it hurts him – a feeling that can be guessed but not expressed – that the city that inspired it all has changed course after having promoted only a dozen of these urban cells.
Without urban ‘corpus’
The green axes plan basically focuses on the Eixample and converts 21 city axes into streets practically pedestrian, creating two squares of about 2,000 square meters. In this mandate he will intervene in the first four, with Council of Cent as the main nerve of the action. The government calls Superilla Barcelona, a name that Rueda rejects and does not recognize because, basically, they are not superblocks. But not only that: “They use the word for marketing, but only lines and little else have been drawn to create pedestrian streets. There is no urban ‘corpus’ nor does it have the model to combat climate change.”Green axes solve nothing“, has riveted, in reference to the environmental, social and economic challenge facing the Catalan capital by 2030.
His plan, on the other hand, does respond, he has defended, to the main challenges of any metropolis. Supported by a ‘power point’ during his intervention in the forum Rethink BCN, has compared both projects. With superblocks, the percentage of citizens living above the maximum air pollution limit (NOtwo) is 6%, compared to 46% in the current scenario. With the green axes, according to their calculations, the figure stays halfway, at 25%.
If you analyze the noise43% of Barcelonans live today surrounded by a unacceptable noise. With their roadmap they would be only 27%. With the scheme of the ‘commons’ it would only drop to 40%. There is also much more biodiversity and CO emissionstwo they would lower 45% compared to 2005 by 19% with the green axes, which does not imply any progress because in 2022 we are already at that same value.
The same thing happens with trade. According to Rueda, with the superblocks, the increase in economic activity grows between 15% and 60% (it is the case of El Born, the first ‘superilla’, established in 1993), while with the green axes “this issue is a question mark but it is most likely that in most of the territory it is negligible”. And finally, the virtues for mobilitywatertight for the Colau project, transverse and well articulated with the urban units proposed by the former director of the Barcelona Public Health Agency, which in its scheme foresees that the main road network Go from 912 to 355 kilometers of streets, reducing the number of vehicles in circulation by only 15%.
“Why don’t we raise them now if we all win?” asked Rueda, who has positioned himself in favor of connecting the tram to Diagonal. “I don’t understand why they do it all over the world and not in Barcelona,” he concluded.