After public hearings aired numerous concerns about the future of the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station in New Brunswick, opponents are disappointed its license will be extended 10 years.
Coming into operation in the 1980s, the station is one of four in Canada and the only nuclear power station outside of Ontario. Consisting of a heavy-water CANDU reactor that generates power, Point Lepreau’s current license is ending, so the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) was required to grant a new one. The current license was for five years, as was the one before that.
The Coalition for Responsible Energy Development in New Brunswick (CRED-NB) and the Canadian Environmental Law Association (CELA) are concerned, noting the longer term will reduce the number of public hearings, which are required when a license expires. It also means more years of creating nuclear waste, for which there is currently no long-term storage plan.
However, NB Power asked for a 25-year renewal, which the groups say would have been worse. CNCSC staff initially recommended a 20-year term.
At public hearings in May, the Passamaquoddy, whose traditional territory includes Point Lepreau, suggested a three-year extension. Chief Hugh Akagi is concerned about waste from the nuclear reactor, which is now stored at the Point Lepreau site but will need to be moved elsewhere, stressing the nation has never given consent for it to be stored on the territory.
“The new license gives NB Power the ability to create and store 10 more years of fresh and dangerous high-level waste on our territory. This is not acceptable,” said Akagi.
“Though we do believe we had some influence on the decision, given that NB Power’s request was for a 25-year license, our efforts did not result in Canada meeting its own legal and related obligations to the nation. We should not be put in the position of having to point this out.”
Mi’kmaq First Nations group Mi’gmawe’l Tplu’taqnn Incorporated requested a five- to 10-year license.
Along with the extension of the reactor operations, NB Power is planning on building two small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) in the next decade. SMRs — a portable nuclear technology still in development — are costly, experimental and produce toxic waste. Those who oppose the technology say any potential benefits it might have in slashing greenhouse gas emissions wouldn’t be felt soon enough to contribute to Canada’s climate targets.
“This longer license ignores that SMRs could present new risks, and does not commit NB Power to a new public hearing to maintain its license as these new risks are added to the site,” said Gail Wylie, spokesperson for CRED-NB.
Coming into operation in the 1980s, the station is one of four in Canada and the only nuclear power station outside of Ontario. Critics say the extension is too long, and doesn’t address the issue of nuclear waste storage.
The CNSC decision said submissions from NB Power show the company is “qualified to carry on the activities that the renewed license will authorize” and that it “will make adequate provision for the protection of the environment, and the health and safety of persons.”
As to why a 10-year license was granted instead of the requested 25 years, the CNSC pointed to “the strong public interest in the hearing process and the need to advance reconciliation with Indigenous nations and communities.”
Five years into the new license, NB Power and CNSC staff will update the public on issues raised during May’s hearings.
Both CELA and CRED-NB’s hope for the meeting is that it is similar to a public hearing, where the body could review the activities at Point Lepreau and potentially decide to suspend the license.