I think they did not get the interview they wanted. Today Cayetana Álvarez de Toledo it is news for its broadside to the PP, its own party, summarized in the book ‘Politically undesirable’ that has just been published. They invited her to the temple of ‘Frequent questions’ (‘FAQS’, TV-3) and it seems to me that what they wanted was to go in that sense: to reel off their disagreements with Pablo Casado, and its perdignations to the secretary general of the party, Teodoro Garcia Egea. The questions they asked him were initially in that sense. But Cayetana, with great skill, turned the tortilla. At the outset, he dialed a line warning that TV-3 had offered to do the interview with a translator through the earpiece, in case he did not understand Catalan, and pointed out: “I do not accept it, and I also do not need it. pinganillo it is a symbol of foreigners. Here we are all Spaniards. “This is how he began by setting the course for his speech.
Related news
And indeed, more than talking about the little war intern in the PP basically spoke of Catalonia. He drew the situation like this: “What happens here in the rest of Europe is perfectly identified: it is the tribalism, the return to the most visceral of the human beingIt is the exclusive and retrograde nationalism, which has left half of Catalonia in the most absolute helplessness. The process has failed, and Catalonia is in decline. “This portrait is not new. Cayetana has expressed it many times. originality of the session, in my opinion, was when he told us his formula to ‘fix’ Catalonia. It consists of four points referring to that half that nationalism has forgotten: “Presence, prestige, power and budget”, and he stressed: “Instead of withdrawal of the State, deployment.” It doesn’t seem like the famous dialogue table, neither one side nor the other, is going to go in that sense.
From this session of the ‘FAQS’ the interview in London to Paul Preston. This remarkable historian is very fond of TV-3. They use it often. They were talking about the vote for Brexit, and since the yes came out, the interviewer, excited, reminded him: “In the 1-O referendum, the yes also came out!” And then Preston, with a smile, replied: “That was irrelevant. That referendum had no legal basis.” Ahh! Wow! It is also a bad way to travel to England and not be told what you want to hear.
Reference-www.elperiodico.com