Justice outraged Sandro Rosell by asking for a maximum compensation of 27 euros for each day in jail

  • The ministry demands that economic compensation for damage not be recognized for the former president of Barça and only asks for compensation for moral damage

  • The former president’s lawyers describe the letter as “controversial without any legal logic”

The Ministry of Justice requested from the National audience that the former president of Barça is not recognized Sandro Rossell compensation as compensation for damage in excess of the 27 euros set for each day he was in preventive detention.

Rosell’s attorneys criticized the Justice Department’s decision, which they described as “controversial writing without any legal logic.” The former president of Barça was 645 days deprived of liberty (approximately 22 months), so that the maximum compensation requested by the ministry is under the leadership of Pilar Llop 17,415 euros.

Rosell was released after a trial at the National High Court in which He was acquitted on all charges against him (crimes of criminal organization and money laundering) and claim compensation of 29.7 million euros.

Justice rejects in this sense that he earns compensation for the economic losses, the financial expenses, those of his defense or those of the family members who traveled to visit him and reduces the money which, in his opinion, to less than 18 000 euros . give, which is for moral harm and calculate in “global perspective”

Criticism of Justice’s reasoning

Rosell’s lawyers criticize that it is the first ruling of the Ministry of Justice after more than 18 months and criticize your text. “Surprisingly, given the resolutions of current contracts that took place with a specific cause in Sandro Rosell’s imprisonment that lasted for two years and the significant economic damage that these resolutions entailed, the Ministry of Justice is of the opinion that such damage would not have occurred if Sandro Rosell had demanded compliance with the contracts that bound him by the courts, as if the deprivation of liberty of one of the contracting parties did not constitute a justifiable reason for termination of contract.

“The legal team of Sandro Rosell – continues with the note – maintains their confidence that the National Supreme Court, far from reasoning without any legal basis, the enormous damage caused by the investigating magistrate Carmen Lamela in criminal proceedings. On the other hand, sources close to Mr. Rosell’s firm determination to prevent by all legal means at his disposal taxpayers from eventually paying for the waste committed, as in their opinion it can only be attributed to the magistrate and the magistrate. / or to the environment in which it was kept “.

Related news

To the European Court of Human Rights

And the statement concludes: “In this sense, Sandro Rosell, who recently saw that his amparo appeal before the Constitutional Court was inadmissible for processing in relation to the complaint he had lodged against the aforementioned magistrate, was not slow to address the issue. on the European Court of Human Rights“.


Leave a Comment