- Biden contested the ruling of a federal judge that prohibits the use of a sanitary standard
- This news comes when about 10,000 undocumented people are on the border
- The judge had decided to prohibit the use of a sanitary regulation to expel migrants with children
DOES NOT ACCEPT MORE MIGRANTS. Biden’s response to a federal judge’s decision to ban the use of the health standard, imposed by his predecessor Donald Trump, was released. The Democratic president decided to challenge the judge’s ruling, seeing the crisis on the border with Mexico and the arrival of thousands of undocumented immigrants.
Related
This measure of sanitary norm, worked for both governments in a matter of expelling the majority of immigrants from the country through the ‘fast track’. It has been a benefit for both administrations, to take the use of the pandemic as a good initiative to not accept more migrants in the country and to deal with asylum requests from Mexico.
Biden challenges Judge’s ruling: I challenge the decision
The EFE agency reported that the Government of the President of the United States, Joe Biden, challenged on Friday the ruling of a federal judge that prohibits the use of a health regulation to expel migrants with children who are intercepted at the border with Mexico.
This news comes at a chaotic time for the administration of the Biden government, due to the problems it has faced on the border with Mexico and the arrival of thousands of undocumented immigrants. They have asked President Biden to take their requests for asylum into account and to be assured of a place within the country. Filed Under: Biden Challenges Judge Ruling
Biden challenges judge ruling: Judge Sullivan’s order appealed
According to the information that is circulating, the Biden administration appealed after a judge of a federal court in the District of Columbia, Emmet Sullivan, gave it a period of two weeks on Thursday to stop using the so-called Title 42, a 1944 rule invoked by the Executive of now former President Donald Trump to prevent the entry of migrants through the border under the pretext of preventing the spread of the coronavirus
It was the imperative need of President Biden, which led to the decision to challenge Judge Sullivan’s wish, and what has drawn the attention of hundreds of migrants, who were hopeful of being able to enter the country in the company of their children; the judge’s request was for those who brought children. Filed Under: Biden Challenges Judge Ruling
Biden Challenges Judge Ruling: Trump’s Rule That Has Worked For Biden
Although Biden’s speech was always handled with the guarantee of helping migrants, in practice, both the Biden and Trump administrations have used Title 42 to expedite deportation of migrants intercepted at the border, such as part of the measures to prevent the spread of covid-19, according to the Efe agency.
A couple of weeks ago, it was Biden who mentioned wanting to continue with the ‘Remain in Mexico’ rule in a ‘lighter’ version, when from the beginning he mentioned that it was simply inhuman. So the Biden administration’s challenge to Judge Sullivan’s ban is not strange. Filed Under: Biden Challenges Judge Ruling
Biden Challenges Judge’s Ruling: The Judge’s Ruling
It was revealed that eIn his ruling on Thursday, the judge argued that Title 42 does not authorize the expulsion of migrants and that, therefore, deportees cannot be denied the opportunity to seek asylum in the United States. For that reason, it was believed that the president would not challenge Sullivan’s decision.
The magistrate gave the Administration 14 days to “explore appeal options” before his decision becomes effective, according to the Efe agency. So until now, Judge Sullivan’s request will be contested and we will have to wait for the next few weeks to know the future of this ruling. Filed Under: Biden Challenges Judge Ruling
Biden challenges judge ruling: Only for migrants traveling with children
This case focuses on families with minors, with which the Government can continue to expel, under Title 42, adult migrants who travel without minors, the Efe agency mentioned. It was considered prudent to trust that the decision to allow family members with children would not be challenged, but it was not a good decision for the Biden administration.
The judge’s decision coincides with a new crisis on the border for Biden, with the blocking of some 10,000 undocumented immigrants, most of them Haitian nationals. It is one of the reasons that has prompted the president to continue with the expulsions, regardless of who the migrants are accompanied by. Filed Under: Biden Challenges Judge Ruling
They must remain in the camp
Migrants who traveled to the edges of the border will have to remain in a makeshift camp under a bridge in southern Texas after having crossed the Rio Grande (Bravo) from Mexico to present their asylum applications to US authorities, he mentioned. Eph.
According to the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP), so far this fiscal year (October 2020-September 2021), a total of 1,541,651 migrants have been detained at the border with Mexico, of which 937,628 were expelled under Title 42 and which gave the president’s administration the opportunity to excuse itself from the migrant requests.
The judge’s opinion
A federal judge in the District of Columbia ruled this Thursday that it is illegal to deny migrant families with children the right to asylum, applying a Trump administration regulation aimed at protecting public health, according to the Efe news agency.
Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order, contained in a 58-page ruling, will take effect in 14 days. The government of former President Donald Trump last year began the application of this regulation, called Title 42, which allows expelling migrants who arrive at the border, considering them a threat to public health in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. .
There is no pretext for the measure
Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan wrote that, taking into account “the wide availability of tests, vaccines and other measures to minimize (the pandemic), this court does not believe that the spread of COVID-19, during the border processing, cannot be significantly mitigated ”.
The government asked the court to suspend the order for 14 days in order to have enough time to “explore its appeal options,” added the ruling, which notes that the “plaintiffs do not oppose that request.” The document described the plaintiffs as “a group of asylum-seeking families who have fled to the United States.”
USA as a place of refuge
“For nearly a century, Congress has recognized that citizens of foreign countries are sometimes forced to flee persecution in their home countries,” the ruling stated. “And it has been the policy of the United States government that this country should serve as a place of refuge for people in such tribulations.”
Just last August, the administration of President Joe Biden proposed a measure that will benefit undocumented immigrants seeking asylum. With this action they intend to alleviate the number of backlogged applications, just as more and more applicants arrive at the southern border of the country.
USCIS in charge of Asylum applications
This initiative, presented by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS, for its acronym in English) and the Department of Justice (DOJ, for its acronym in English), proposes that the decision on these asylum cases be handled by officials of the Service of Immigration and Citizenship (USCIS, for its acronym in English).
“These changes are intended to improve the ability to consider asylum requests made by individuals found on or near the border, in a way that is more effective in ensuring fundamental justice,” the joint statement from both departments indicates.
A change in the process
The proposal in favor of immigrants basically presents the idea of changing the process in the asylum procedures to be able to cover more applications. “It’s both straightforward and potentially a game changer,” said Doris Meissner, former director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Meissner says this “promises a fundamental shift in ensuring meaningful humanitarian protection for those who qualify for asylum, and border control that enables safe, legal and orderly migration at the border with Mexico,” Meissner added.
mundohispanico.com